Proof

Results from live engagements.

Every figure below is read from the client’s own console rather than estimated. Between them, these three engagements have raised 22,802 findings — each one traceable back to the sentence in an interview that evidenced it.

Tier 1 construction

Bid process discovery

62
Stakeholders interviewed: 421
Discovery goals evidenced, of 493 mapped: 10,959
Findings raised: 154
Documents analysed alongside the interviews

The challenge

A work-winning division running a long, multi-stage bid process across estimating, design, project management and leadership. Leadership needed to know where AI could lift efficiency without cutting headcount.

The approach

Scout interviewed stakeholders across every function via Microsoft Teams and voice. Lens mapped the full tender lifecycle as a six-layer service blueprint. Arc ranked the interventions by impact against effort.

Outcome

The sponsor extended discovery to additional divisions, stood up an AI steering committee, and launched a second phase focused on the delivery side.

Key findings

Estimates were not benchmarked against final costs — independently confirmed by multiple stakeholders in different roles.
Post-bid feedback was not systematically tracked, so knowledge was lost between tenders.
No effort tracking per tender, making return on bid investment impossible to measure.
Ownership gaps in key process steps, with several stakeholders each deflecting responsibility for the same deliverable.

Signal quality · 10,959 findings

3,229
Corroborated: 6,656
Single source: 1,074
Disputed

Investment and advisory

Discovery across a group

50
Stakeholders interviewed: 324
Discovery goals evidenced, of 361 mapped: 7,514
Findings raised: 516
Documents analysed alongside the interviews

The challenge

A specialist investment and advisory group running several related businesses — an active investment manager alongside a cross-border corporate advisory arm — where how each one actually worked had never been mapped end to end.

The approach

Separate engagements for the funds business and the advisory arm rather than one for the group, so nothing was averaged across businesses that work differently. Stakeholders were interviewed on whichever channel suited them, across 518 meeting threads, with 516 documents analysed alongside.

Outcome

Ninety per cent of the goals mapped across the group were evidenced, and 1,317 improvement opportunities were raised — each one traceable back to the interview that evidenced it.

Signal quality · 7,514 findings

1,252
Corroborated: 5,633
Single source: 629
Disputed

Property development

In-housing the operating model

17
Stakeholders interviewed: 176
Discovery goals evidenced, of 195 mapped: 4,329
Findings raised: 476
Documents analysed alongside the interviews

The challenge

A boutique residential developer mid-transition from a founder-driven, project-by-project model reliant on external consultants to an in-housed platform, having brought development management, project management, legal, marketing, finance and acquisitions under one roof in quick succession. Nobody had written down how the new shape was meant to work.

The approach

No workshops and no site visits. Seventeen stakeholders across the in-housed functions, with 476 documents uploaded or generated for analysis alongside the interviews — more documents than the business has people.

Outcome

A mapped operating model for a business that had never had one written down, and 91 ranked solution proposals against it. Leadership was briefed from the live discovery console.

Key findings

No structured handover between acquisitions and development: development managers inherited concept plans and headline pricing without the underwriting assumptions behind them.

Signal quality · 4,329 findings

928
Corroborated: 3,122
Single source: 279
Disputed

Every engagement reports the same four measures so they can be compared: stakeholders reached, discovery goals evidenced against goals mapped, findings raised, and documents analysed. Signal quality splits the findings by how well each is evidenced — corroborated by a second source, held on a single source, or disputed and pending resolution. Clients are identified by sector until each approves being named.

Your organisation could be next.

See what Agentic Discovery uncovers in your processes, your teams and your operations.

How an engagement runs